PET 2026 · Polity

Five writs: match the remedy to the wrong

Judicial remedies under Article 32 (Supreme Court) and Article 226 (High Courts)

PDF ↓PNG ↓
MINDMAPS FOR UPSCPET 2026 · VISUAL REVISION

Five writs: match the remedy to the wrong

Judicial remedies under Article 32 (Supreme Court) and Article 226 (High Courts)

Mindmap
Constitutional Writs (Art 32 & Art 226)

Habeas corpus

  • Protects personal liberty against unlawful detention.
  • The court examines the legal basis for holding a person.
  • Key question: is this detention lawful?

Mandamus

  • Directs performance of a public or statutory duty where legally required.
  • Focus: an authority’s failure or refusal to perform that duty.
  • Key question: which legally owed duty remains unperformed?

Prohibition

  • Restrains a lower court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction.
  • Its usual focus is an ongoing proceeding.
  • Key idea: prevent proceedings beyond lawful authority.

Certiorari

  • Can quash an unlawful order of a lower court or tribunal.
  • Grounds include jurisdictional error or breach of natural justice.
  • Key idea: review and correct an impugned order.

Quo warranto

  • Questions a person’s legal authority to hold a public office.
  • Focus: legal eligibility for the office, not personal popularity.
  • Article 32 protects Fundamental Rights; Article 226 has a wider remedial scope.
Understand · Connect · Recallmindmapsforupsc.com

Practise this concept · संबंधित प्रश्न

One visual, several questions. These links open the original paper at the matching question.

30 Oct · Shift 1 · 2026

Sources & study notes · स्रोत

Independent revision material, linked to the paper’s concepts. The question papers and answer-key status are available on OpenPYQ.